| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeremy Schneider <schneider(at)ardentperf(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com>, "Nasby, Jim" <nasbyj(at)amazon(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Collation version tracking for macOS |
| Date: | 2022-11-01 12:42:46 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGLxWZNpvPVuRkiXT9TwDLgHK-hinpZ856o88vVZM7kHzA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 11:33 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> What I'm wondering is where those ICU installations are going to come
> from. In order for this project to be viable, we would need to convince
> some combination of ICU maintainers, OS packagers, and PGDG packagers to
> provide and maintain five year's worth of ICU packages (yearly releases
> AFAICT). Is that something we are willing to get into?
I hacked on this on a Debian machine that has a couple of these
installed and they work fine, but now I realise that might have to do
with the major upgrade history of the machine. So yeah... probably.
:-/ Not being involved in packaging I have no idea how plausible such
a backports (erm, forwardports?) repo would be, and I have even less
idea for other distros.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Verite | 2022-11-01 12:43:03 | Re: [patch] \g with multiple result sets and \watch with copy queries |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2022-11-01 12:37:39 | Re: heavily contended lwlocks with long wait queues scale badly |