Re: Guiding principle for dropping LLVM versions?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Xing Guo <higuoxing(at)gmail(dot)com>, Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Guiding principle for dropping LLVM versions?
Date: 2024-01-25 03:44:43
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLsyppKY5qvh9p1YG4PtgtyzR8S76cx7_0O9DjyNjbnmA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thanks all for the discussion. Pushed. A few build farm animals will
now fail in the configure step as discussed, and need some adjustment
(ie disable LLVM or upgrade to LLVM 10+ for the master branch).

Next year I think we should be able to do a much bigger cleanup, by
moving to LLVM 14+.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2024-01-25 03:57:06 Re: Remove redundant HandleWalWriterInterrupts()
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2024-01-25 03:43:05 Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby