Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bogus collation version recording in recordMultipleDependencies
Date: 2021-05-05 21:12:18
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLkNYEJ+Yzj5JcuS91yRjF8fuM0E86=bvWPEQ0FXZp0ow@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 8:58 AM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> this is an open item for release 14 . The discussion seems to have gone
> silent for a couple of weeks. Are we in a position to make any
> decisions? I hear what Andres says, but is anyone acting on it?

I'm going to revert this and resubmit for 15. That'll give proper
time to reconsider the question of whether pg_depend is right for
this, and come up with a non-rushed response to the composite type
problem etc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-05-05 21:22:37 Re: Dubious assertion in RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2021-05-05 21:09:47 cache lookup failed for statistics object 123