Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Worth using personality(ADDR_NO_RANDOMIZE) for EXEC_BACKEND on linux?
Date: 2022-01-10 11:29:44
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLfB1JiSmNYF4R_OQdB9ziPmEUhCu1z5+ifi1=uNgOisw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 8, 2022 at 9:20 AM Bossart, Nathan <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com> wrote:
> FWIW I just found this patch very useful for testing some EXEC_BACKEND
> stuff on Linux.

Thanks for testing. Tidied and pushed, to master only for now.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Verite 2022-01-10 11:49:07 Re: ICU for global collation
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-01-10 10:39:57 Re: Multiple Query IDs for a rewritten parse tree