Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI
Date: 2025-03-04 00:14:28
Message-ID: CA+hUKGLZ0i6U+VvZ+_UVpX+z8D=uwNzv8s-Crtq1bNy62sBo5A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 11:39 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2025-03-04 11:35:30 +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > I propose to turn these on by default tomorrow, unless someone speaks
> > up with reasons why we shouldn't.

> I'm worried about enabling them by default eating up CI credits even
> faster. Not for cfbot, where we bring our own compute resources, but for folks
> own repos.

It would be nice to know what the expected cost in Cirrus credits is
for each task, and the per-month limit for personal repos. mingw must
be *vastly* more expensive than these little guys (licence cost +
run time).

> I quite evidently lost track of that patch, but I think we should instead pick
> https://postgr.es/m/20240413021221.hg53rvqlvldqh57i%40awork3.anarazel.de back
> up, with that we could enable these tasks by default for cfbot, without
> enabling them for everyone.

WFM in the meantime until we can turbo-boost the TAP tests. I will respond
over there...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2025-03-04 00:27:29 Re: ci: Allow running mingw tests by default via environment variable
Previous Message Jacob Champion 2025-03-04 00:07:35 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER