From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Commitfest 2020-11 is closed |
Date: | 2020-12-03 06:45:07 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKGLQzUUtPKocWdv-Z8fXXwPqeB_HCQodrZqSttyNLShFcg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 12:02 PM Josef Šimánek <josef(dot)simanek(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> st 2. 12. 2020 v 23:36 odesílatel Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> napsal:
> > On 12/2/20 5:13 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > > I'm experimenting with Github's built in CI. All other ideas welcome.
> >
> > I'd look very closely at gitlab.
>
> I was about to respond before with the same idea. Feel free to ping
> regarding another CI. Also there is possibility to move to GitHub
> Actions (free open source CI). I got some experience with that as
> well.
I spent today getting something working on Github just to try it out,
and started a new thread[1] about that. I've not tried Gitlab and
have no opinion about that; if someone has a working patch similar to
that, I'd definitely be interested to take a look. I've looked at
some others. For what cfbot is doing (namely: concentrating the work
of hundreds into one "account" via hundreds of branches), the spin-up
times and concurrency limits are a bit of a problem on many of them.
FWIW I think they're all wonderful for offering this service to open
source projects and I'm grateful that they do it!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2020-12-03 07:02:55 | Re: convert elog(LOG) calls to ereport |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2020-12-03 06:38:39 | Re: Printing LSN made easy |