On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 2:44 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
> I found 0001 patch was committed in de829ddf23, and which added new
> wait event WalrcvExit. This name seems not consistent with other wait
> events. I'm thinking it's better to rename it to WalReceiverExit. Thought?
> Patch attached.
Agreed, your names are better. Thanks.