From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jan Březina <2janbrezina(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #18219: libpq does not take into consideration UNICODE define |
Date: | 2023-11-30 22:19:53 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKGLHjbNEqJUBYYU6izDBUxysHPqcEC=JwJoFR7fuFREr3A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:58 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Seems like a non-starter.
... and I should probably explain why. This project has difficulty
maintaining Windows support, because of a general lack of PostgreSQL
developers working on that platform (but we welcome more! patches
welcome!) and a disproportionately high amount of maintenance work
that it generates. One factor is that there are several different
Windows configurations (different compilers, C runtimes, build
systems, file system semantics, partial POSIX emulations like MSYS and
Cygwin...) to consider. I doubt we'd want to add another dimension to
that problem space by saying we have to maintain and test the UNICODE
and non-UNICODE code paths in our libraries.
Hence my intuition that we should be figuring out where the right
place is to suppress or undefine UNICODE.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-11-30 22:32:47 | Re: BUG #18219: libpq does not take into consideration UNICODE define |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2023-11-30 21:58:22 | Re: BUG #18219: libpq does not take into consideration UNICODE define |