Re: CI, macports, darwin version problems

On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 10:48 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> WRT your patches:
> - I think we ought to switch to the -runner image, otherwise we'll just
> continue to get that "upgraded" warning

Right, let's try it.

> - With a fingerprint_script specified, we need to add
> reupload_on_changes: true
> otherwise it'll not be updated.

Ahh, I see.

> - I think the fingerprint_script should use sw_vers, just as the script
> does. I see no reason to differ?

Yeah might as well. I started with Darwin versions because that is
what MacPorts complains about, but they move in lockstep.

> - We could just sw_vers -productVersion | sed 's/\..*//g' instead of the more
> complicated version you used, I doubt that they're going to go away from
> numerical major versions...

Yep.

I've attached a new version like that. Let's see which runner machine
gets it and how it turns out...