Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster
Date: 2022-12-07 01:13:06
Message-ID: CA+hUKGL4uosgv4ynpJNGe11_0oyH4GGtzxkGpJqXJ114LKG_KQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 2:08 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * It would probably be safe to re-use the inherited signalfd since
> > + * signalfds only see the current processes pending signals, but it
>
> I think you mean "current process's", right ?

Fixed in v5, thanks.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2022-12-07 01:14:01 Re: Force streaming every change in logical decoding
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2022-12-07 01:12:37 Re: Using WaitEventSet in the postmaster