| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)iki(dot)fi, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #17116: Assert failed in SerialSetActiveSerXmin() on commit of parallelized serializable transaction |
| Date: | 2023-03-06 03:52:31 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGL-w0cWiCOHhBd97XV37Ur+GAz0QOPZCgMo4TByJ8gRkA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sun, Mar 5, 2023 at 10:00 PM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've caught one of asserts we discussed here again (in a different setup)
> and would like to continue working on the fixes.
> I've rechecked
> v4-0001-Fix-assert-failures-in-parallel-SERIALIZABLE-READ.patch
> — it's still in a good shape, needs only minor corrections for the
> master branch and can be applied as-is to REL_12_STABLE .. REL_15_STABLE.
> The modified test serializable-parallel-2 and new test
> serializable-parallel-3 still trigger asserts with unpatched predicate.c
> and make check-world passes with the complete patch applied.
Yeah, I see the same here.
> So if that patch requires attention of a seasoned reviewer, let's
> send it to the commitfest (I can register the patch if you don't mind)?
> Otherwise, maybe just commit it and move to other bugs...
Pushed. Thanks!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2023-03-06 06:00:01 | Re: BUG #17116: Assert failed in SerialSetActiveSerXmin() on commit of parallelized serializable transaction |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2023-03-06 03:02:02 | Re: BUG #17368: Assert failed in GetSafeSnapshot() for SERIALIZABLE READ ONLY DEFERRABLE transaction |