From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vamshikrishna T <tvk1271(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #18009: Postgres Recovery not happening |
Date: | 2023-07-05 03:35:28 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKGKz2SiyRu6tZm8NVQuAP+s70gjf+dvoZttvvE37-R-7VQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 1:48 AM Vamshikrishna T <tvk1271(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thank you for your immediate response, This is not on the default file system of AIX ( JFS2 ), but on a specific special purpose file system. looks like ( open_datasync ) O_DSYNC is causing the issue which seems to be not honoured on this file system. Yeah abrupt shutdown can be treated as power loss.
Sounds like a fun project. Is this alien technology that regular AIX
users won't run into and I should forget this conversation ever
happened, or is it a clue we should use wal_sync_method=fdatasync by
default on AIX?
> I used wal_sync_method=fdatasync, ( although i am not sure the problem vanished or not, because it is not getting reproduced ) but what i observe
> is there is an immediate explicit sync calls to the files present in ../pg_wal/ directory post write call completions.
>
> 2023-07-04 03:36:04.259 CDT|64a3d9b4.8701bc|LOG: checkpoint strting: time
> 2023-07-04 03:36:06.263 CDT|64a3d9b4.8701bc|LOG: checkpoint complete: wrote 21 buffers (0.1%); 0 WAL file(s) added, 0 removed, 0 recycled; write=1.925 s, sync=0.053 s, total=2.005 s; sync files=20, longest=0.019 s, average=0.003 s; distance=32 kB, estimate=32 kB
>
> I can see between these two time interval, write caches are cleared. With wal_sync_method=fdatasync tunable, Is it safe to assume all the Postgres DB writes during checkpointing are called via explicit call to OS level sync() or fsync(), irrespective of O_DSYNC during open?.
Yes. Our periodic checkpoints write out all the relation data (files
like base/1234/2345 that hold tables and indexes), and then always
call fsync() (sometimes the pwrite() calls and the fsync() happen in
different processes*). But WAL data (files like
pg_wal/000000010000000000000001) get the various wal_sync_method
behaviours, with (IMHO unfortunately) different defaults based on a
series of inconsistent platform-by-platform historical decisions...
Just BTW, if you're interested in PostgreSQL on AIX, see
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/AIX .
*With interesting cross-platform consequences. If you're a
kernel/VMM/storage person you might find
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Fsync_Errors interesting. Of course
we have no idea what any closed source kernel does.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Wilm Hoyer | 2023-07-05 06:43:57 | AW: XML column causes record to be both NULL and NOT NULL |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2023-07-05 01:23:22 | Re: BUG #17695: Failed Assert in logical replication snapbuild. |