Re: Outdated comments about proc->sem in lwlock.c

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Outdated comments about proc->sem in lwlock.c
Date: 2021-07-09 06:15:35
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKbqpBvfzzX8bZG_sORyCCDN8dHeUiVN+pPdWzHv5zEDQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:48 AM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> > On 3 Jun 2021, at 04:07, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Here's a patch to remove the misleading comments.
>
> While not an expert in the area; reading the referenced commit and the code
> with the now removed comments, I think this is correct.

Thanks! I made the comments slightly more uniform and pushed.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2021-07-09 06:26:11 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2
Previous Message Amul Sul 2021-07-09 06:11:09 Re: when the startup process doesn't (logging startup delays)