| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: lockup in parallel hash join on dikkop (freebsd 14.0-current) |
| Date: | 2023-02-07 00:09:08 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGKY-W2hmWBbqsCQsjv-KO3sSj1+0msV4BVH+mDHQ3ez3A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 1:06 PM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2/7/23 00:48, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 12:46 PM Tomas Vondra
> > <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> >> No, I left the workload as it was for the first lockup, so `make check`
> >> runs everything as is up until the "join" test suite.
> >
> > Wait, shouldn't that be join_hash?
>
> No, because join_hash does not exist on 11 (it was added in 12). Also,
> it actually locked up like this - that's the lockup I reported on 28/1.
Oh, good. I had been trying to repro with 12 here and forgot that you
were looking at 11...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2023-02-07 00:16:36 | Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2023-02-07 00:06:35 | Re: lockup in parallel hash join on dikkop (freebsd 14.0-current) |