Re: A test for replay of regression tests

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Date: 2022-03-22 03:58:49
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKRtpz3qAg7=Yne_oJ8ZdeiT3JbPPCayjgHFgrKUeKViQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 4:31 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> SELECT pg_relation_size('vac_truncate_test') = 0;
> ?column?
> ----------
> - t
> + f

Thanks. Ahh, déjà vu... this probably needs the same treatment as
b700f96c and 3414099c provided for the reloptions test. Well, at
least the first one. Here's a patch like that.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Try-to-stabilize-vacuum-test.patch text/x-patch 2.7 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2022-03-22 04:01:06 Re: simplifying foreign key/RI checks
Previous Message Sadhuprasad Patro 2022-03-22 03:34:37 Re: Per-table storage parameters for TableAM/IndexAM extensions