Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: raf <raf(at)raf(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation
Date: 2020-06-13 00:20:13
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKReY5WmxjQmZfZgQDgeaVWrtT-nEwJJN0r52QrRN7i+Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 10:11 AM raf <raf(at)raf(dot)org> wrote:
> "their contents does not" should be "their contents do not".

Thanks. I'd already reworded that in the v2 patch, later in the thread.

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2020-06-13 04:49:02 Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation
Previous Message Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais 2020-06-12 22:43:22 Re: BUG #15285: Query used index over field with ICU collation in some cases wrongly return 0 rows