Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date: 2025-03-19 22:14:29
Message-ID: CA+hUKGKR0F6er7N-r3Rbct2PMzo+dpkR6HyoWcHjZYZqEQAM_g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 11:02 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 10:04 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > > How feasible/fragile/weird would it be to dlopen() it on demand?

. o O { There may also be security reasons to reject the idea, would
need to look into that... }

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2025-03-19 22:17:37 Re: AIO v2.5
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2025-03-19 22:02:57 Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER