| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGOPTIONS="-fh" make check gets stuck since Postgres 11 |
| Date: | 2019-07-09 03:04:27 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGKOgL7HkmW3Qd-ckxdHQQRCR+b3YYGB+M+=PdvmsveGXg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 2:45 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 02:30:51PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > Yeah. I had obviously never noticed that test script. +1 for just
> > enabling hash joins the top of join_hash.sql in 12+, and the
> > equivalent section in 11's join.sql (which is luckily at the end of
> > the file).
>
> Right, I did not pay much attention to REL_11_STABLE. In this case
> the test begins around line 2030 and reaches the bottom of the file.
> I would actually add a RESET at the bottom of it to avoid any tests to
> be impacted, as usually bug-fix tests are just appended. Thomas,
> perhaps you would prefer fixing it yourself? Or should I?
It's my mistake. I'll fix it later today.
--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-07-09 03:10:51 | Re: Postgres 11: Table Partitioning and Primary Keys |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2019-07-09 03:04:19 | Re: doc: improve PG 12 to_timestamp()/to_date() wording |