| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: A test for replay of regression tests |
| Date: | 2022-08-03 21:24:24 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGKDsx=kpVqj_s5QcYgGtrNqci75e5cp-C4b8z52VoEaPQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 3:30 AM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 12:10:23PM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > This adds 2 whole minutes to the recovery check, when running with the
> > Windows serial-only scripts on Cirrus CI (using Andres's CI patches).
> > For Linux it adds ~20 seconds to the total of -j8 check-world.
> > Hopefully that's time well spent, because it adds test coverage for
> > all the redo routines, and hopefully soon we won't have to run 'em in
> > series on Windows.
>
> Should 027-stream-regress be renamed to something that starts earlier ?
> Off-list earlier this year, Andres referred to 000.
Do you have any data on improved times from doing that?
I have wondered about moving it into 001_stream_rep.pl.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-08-03 21:28:02 | Re: Checking pgwin32_is_junction() errors |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2022-08-03 21:21:58 | Re: Proposal: Support custom authentication methods using hooks |