| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Christophe Pettus <xof(at)thebuild(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded |
| Date: | 2024-03-18 22:48:50 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGK9LUq=uygBRFt3vFO1RL+_scsT4+hMkvea_zTttHZ59Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 10:17 AM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> ... (though my patch could be a little sneakier and steal
> all the bytes right up to the = sign to get more space for our
> message!).
Here's one like that. No musl here -- does this work Wolfgang? Do we
think it's generous enough with space in practice that we could just
always do this for __linux__ systems without anyone noticing (ie
including glibc users)? Should we be more specific about which LD_*
variables? Do people not doing hacking/testing ever really set those,
eg on production servers? This code path was once used by up to a
dozen or so OSes but they're all dead, only Linux, Solaris and macOS
left, and I don't have any reason to think they suffer from this
problem and Macs don't even follow the SysV LD_ naming convention,
hence gating on Linux.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Don-t-clobber-LD_-environment-variables.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2024-03-18 23:23:44 | BUG #18399: Query plan optimization results in runtime error when hoisting cast from inside subquery |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2024-03-18 22:36:08 | Re: Postgres jdbc driver inconsistent behaviour with double precession |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Jungwirth | 2024-03-18 22:49:28 | Re: SQL:2011 application time |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2024-03-18 22:48:34 | Re: Built-in CTYPE provider |