Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Subject: Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option
Date: 2019-07-08 01:37:13
Message-ID: CA+hUKGK8ecSSL0oLTsEaha+JBP9-A2929jXN6_kt9SY=DgkUtA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 9:06 PM Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The attached patch include the fix for all the comment given

Hi Surafel,

There's a call to adjust_limit_rows_costs() hiding under
contrib/postgres_fdw, so this fails check-world.

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-07-08 01:46:04 Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Flexible "partition pruning" hook
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2019-07-08 01:18:21 Re: Optimze usage of immutable functions as relation