Re: A test for replay of regression tests

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A test for replay of regression tests
Date: 2022-01-22 05:00:44
Message-ID: CA+hUKGK65xVqNgsSPyrr2LEwtfUN=GfEuQ868hTC-mu0bFG42A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 8:48 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Unfortunately we don't quite seem there yet:

And another way to fail:

pg_dump: error: query failed: ERROR: canceling statement due to
conflict with recovery

https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=dangomushi&dt=2022-01-22%2003%3A06%3A42

Probably needs hot_standby_feedback on. Will adjust this soon.

One more failure seen in today's crop was a "stats" failure on
seawasp, which must be the well known pre-existing problem. (Probably
just needs someone to rewrite the stats subsystem to use shared memory
instead of UDP).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-01-22 05:30:02 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2022-01-22 04:21:00 Re: row filtering for logical replication