| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Wong <mark(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: stress test for parallel workers |
| Date: | 2020-10-15 22:11:34 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGK4CQei7cOprdYGq4tx6R9V5kfBYHd8PcsXCvfK9zU-bQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 1:43 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I wrote:
> > For our archives' sake: today I got seemingly-automated mail informing me
> > that this patch has been merged into the 4.19-stable, 5.4-stable,
> > 5.7-stable, and 5.8-stable kernel branches; but not 4.4-stable,
> > 4.9-stable, or 4.14-stable, because it failed to apply.
>
> And this morning's mail brought news that the latter three branches
> are now patched as well. So I guess at this point it's down to
> platform vendors as to whether or how fast they absorb such changes.
Today I upgraded a Debian buster box and saw a new kernel image roll
in. Lo and behold:
$ zgrep 'stack expansion'
/usr/share/doc/linux-image-4.19.0-11-amd64/changelog.gz
- [powerpc*] Allow 4224 bytes of stack expansion for the signal frame
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2020-10-15 22:24:24 | Re: Use list_delete_xxxcell O(1) instead of list_delete_ptr O(N) in some places |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-10-15 21:40:51 | Re: kevent latch paths don't handle postmaster death well |