Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions
Date: 2019-07-13 11:17:00
Message-ID: CA+hUKGK++soqdMDUhpDzz-74oZtRJuMnFnWwTHZshopZ1dW2AA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:22 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Here's some semi-automated feedback, noted while going through
> failures on cfbot.cputube.org. You have a stray editor file
> src/backend/parser/parse_node.c.~1~. Something is failing to compile
> while doing the temp-install in make check-world, which probably
> indicates that some test or contrib module is using the interface you
> changed?

Please disregard the the comment about the ".~1~" file, my mistake.
As for the check-world failure, it's here:

pg_stat_statements.c:1024:11: error: implicit declaration of function
'pg_strtouint64' is invalid in C99
[-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
rows = pg_strtouint64(completionTag + 5, NULL, 10);
^
Apparently it needs to include common/string.h.

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2019-07-13 11:34:22 Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2019-07-13 10:25:51 Re: POC: Cleaning up orphaned files using undo logs