Re: 039_end_of_wal: error in "xl_tot_len zero" test

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Anton Voloshin <a(dot)voloshin(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 039_end_of_wal: error in "xl_tot_len zero" test
Date: 2024-08-23 22:43:00
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJz0PtGmpw=x8r7zDsh2HCEss_xO9YD=aJa8tSL0EeZog@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 10:33 AM Nathan Bossart
<nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am seeing the exact problem described in this thread on my laptop since
> commit 490f869. I have yet to do a thorough investigation, but what I've
> seen thus far does seem to fit the subtle-differences-in-generated-WAL
> theory. If no one is planning to pick up the fix soon, I will try to.

Sorry for dropping that. It looks like we know approximately how to
stabilise it, and I'll look at it early next week if you don't beat me
to it, but please feel free if you would like to.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-08-23 22:45:02 Re: Test 041_checkpoint_at_promote.pl faild in installcheck due to missing injection_points
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2024-08-23 22:33:10 Re: 039_end_of_wal: error in "xl_tot_len zero" test