Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: On the stability of TAP tests for LDAP
Date: 2019-07-25 22:18:48
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJyftitapnCkvnssAdSsNpKMOPR9wZVy_wWkt7ZhhPnEg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 12:51 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Thanks for the updated patch, this looks good. I have done a series
> of tests keeping my laptop busy and I haven't seen a failure where I
> usually see problems 10%~20% of the time. So that seems to help,
> thanks!

Pushed, thanks.

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2019-07-25 23:32:53 Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key Management Service (KMS)
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-07-25 22:10:00 Re: ON CONFLICT (and manual row locks) cause xmax of updated tuple to unnecessarily be set