From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PGOPTIONS="-fh" make check gets stuck since Postgres 11 |
Date: | 2019-07-09 02:30:51 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKGJxwf+DXiUGsMYAsn=sUdU4VUv6CEs1L0r+FAV4HNDu4Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 2:22 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Based on a suggestion from Andres (if I recall correctly), I wrapped
> > each individual test in savepoint/rollback, and then set just the GUCs
> > needed to get the plan shape and execution code path I wanted to
> > exercise, and I guess I found that I only needed to disable merge
> > joins for some of them. The idea was that the individual tests could
> > be understood independently.
>
> But per this discussion, they can only be "understood independently"
> if you make some assumptions about the prevailing values of the
> planner GUCs.
Yeah. I had obviously never noticed that test script. +1 for just
enabling hash joins the top of join_hash.sql in 12+, and the
equivalent section in 11's join.sql (which is luckily at the end of
the file).
--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2019-07-09 02:37:37 | Re: Postgres 11: Table Partitioning and Primary Keys |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2019-07-09 02:22:13 | Re: PGOPTIONS="-fh" make check gets stuck since Postgres 11 |