Re: 12.2: Howto check memory-leak in worker?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter <pmc(at)citylink(dot)dinoex(dot)sub(dot)org>
Cc: Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, "pgsql-generallists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 12.2: Howto check memory-leak in worker?
Date: 2020-05-04 22:57:04
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJt1nMN+u68Qg84L2ffbqKonoJO0r-diV1fgCkYcjtrsA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:13 AM Peter <pmc(at)citylink(dot)dinoex(dot)sub(dot)org> wrote:
> BTW, I would greatly appreciate if we would reconsider the need for
> the server to read the postmaster.pid file every few seconds (probably
> needed for something, I don't know).
> That makes it necessary to set atime=off to get a spindown, and I
> usually prefer to have atime=on so I can see what my stuff is
> currently doing.

That'd be this:

/*
* Once a minute, verify that postmaster.pid hasn't been removed or
* overwritten. If it has, we force a shutdown. This avoids having
* postmasters and child processes hanging around after their database
* is gone, and maybe causing problems if a new database cluster is
* created in the same place. It also provides some protection
* against a DBA foolishly removing postmaster.pid and manually
* starting a new postmaster. Data corruption is likely to ensue from
* that anyway, but we can minimize the damage by aborting ASAP.
*/
if (now - last_lockfile_recheck_time >= 1 * SECS_PER_MINUTE)
{
if (!RecheckDataDirLockFile())

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ricky Ramirez 2020-05-04 23:24:09 Temporary table has become problematically persistent
Previous Message Peter 2020-05-04 22:01:32 Re: 12.2: Howto check memory-leak in worker?