On Fri, Sep 8, 2023 at 2:48 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> +1 to your proposal of using a struct for the entries in the cache.
Cool, I'll push/back-patch after 16.0. Even though this seems
simple enough, it's an extremely low probability failure and I'd
rather keep out of REL_16_STABLE's way...