Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow!

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, "Gregory Stark (as CFM)" <stark(dot)cfm(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow!
Date: 2023-03-20 20:34:26
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJsE-1pC8VGi5YOU-b5jsMnEe5YLdwau2LucdL4R142vA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 9:22 AM Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> Yeah, even aside from flappers there's the problem that it's about as
> common for real commits to break some test as it is for patches to
> start failing tests. So often it's a real failure but it's nothing to
> do with the patch, it has to do with the commit that went into git.

That is true. The best solution to that problem, I think, is to teach
cfbot that it should test on top of the most recent master commit that
succeeded in CI here
https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commits/master . It's on my
list...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2023-03-20 20:35:38 Re: Experiments with Postgres and SSL
Previous Message Greg Stark 2023-03-20 20:31:03 Re: Experiments with Postgres and SSL