Re: pg_upgrade test failure

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade test failure
Date: 2023-02-06 22:03:18
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJnbNm_WmtzmCwPXZpYtqLnMy1=atCHUtNki8pbDhVXSQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 10:57 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On February 6, 2023 1:51:20 PM PST, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >Next up: the new "running" tests, spuriously failing around 8.8% of CI
> >builds on FreeBSD. I'll go and ping that thread...
>
> Is that rate unchanged? I thought I fixed the main issue last week?

Unfortunately my cfbot database only holds a week's history. What I
see is that there were 1254 FreeBSD tasks run in that window, of which
163 failed, and (more interestingly) 111 of those failures succeeded
on every other platform. And clicking on a few on cfbot's page
reveals that it's the new running stuff, and I'm still trying to find
the interesting logs...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-02-06 22:08:50 Re: pg_upgrade test failure
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2023-02-06 22:00:46 pgsql: Fix more outdated comments

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-02-06 22:08:50 Re: pg_upgrade test failure
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-02-06 22:01:08 Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches