Re: Guiding principle for dropping LLVM versions?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Devrim Gündüz <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Guiding principle for dropping LLVM versions?
Date: 2023-10-22 02:04:15
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJm3odtgyPc5kduBYnVP9hb0+-Zy5RofdgHL1=ENUDb0A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Rebased. I also noticed this woefully out of date line:

- PGAC_PATH_PROGS(LLVM_CONFIG, llvm-config llvm-config-7
llvm-config-6.0 llvm-config-5.0 llvm-config-4.0 llvm-config-3.9)
+ PGAC_PATH_PROGS(LLVM_CONFIG, llvm-config llvm-config-17
llvm-config-16 llvm-config-15 llvm-config-14)

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-jit-Require-at-least-LLVM-14-if-enabled.patch text/x-patch 29.5 KB
v3-0002-jit-Use-opaque-pointers-in-all-supported-LLVM-ver.patch text/x-patch 7.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 2023-10-22 02:39:20 Re: Row pattern recognition
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2023-10-22 01:59:04 Re: The documentation for storage type 'plain' actually allows single byte header