| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage |
| Date: | 2022-08-15 10:48:22 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGJjcahPiMeg3nNPyEj06S1iDBJisry=4fMsz6fjobiSQQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 8:36 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On 15.08.22 03:48, Thomas Munro wrote:
> >> I vaguely remember successfully trying it in the past. But I just tried it
> >> unsuccessfully in a VM and there's a bunch of other places saying it's not
> >> working...
> >> https://github.com/microsoft/WSL/issues/4240
> > I think we'd better remove our claim that it works then. Patch attached.
>
> When I developed support for abstract unix sockets, I did test them on
> Windows. The lack of support on WSL appears to be an unrelated fact.
> See for example how [0] talks about them separately.
User amoldeshpande's complaint was posted to the WSL project's issue
tracker but it's about native Windows/winsock code and s/he says so
explicitly (though other people pile in with various other complaints
including WSL interop). User sunilmut's comment says it's not
working, and [0] is now just confusing everybody :-(
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Damir Belyalov | 2022-08-15 11:10:44 | Fwd: Merging statistics from children instead of re-sampling everything |
| Previous Message | Richard Guo | 2022-08-15 08:48:23 | Re: Making Vars outer-join aware |