Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyle Kingsbury <aphyr(at)jepsen(dot)io>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation
Date: 2020-06-11 05:40:55
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJgSn+JF929bMpxhn21p0ArUwjs_RrxGKb2_6Fuu5J09w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:14 PM Kyle Kingsbury <aphyr(at)jepsen(dot)io> wrote:
> I wanted to let you know that I've put together a draft of a report on these
> findings, and if you've got any comments you'd like to offer, I'd be happy to
> hear them, either on-list or privately.
> http://jepsen.io/analyses/postgresql-12.3?draft-token=Kets1Quayfs

What do you think about this documentation update?

I'm not experienced with biblioentry academic references; if someone
would like to show me how this is supposed to be cited, I'm all ears.

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Doc-Add-references-for-SI-and-SSI.patch text/x-patch 5.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Bug reporting form 2020-06-11 06:48:20 BUG #16490: We cannot able to access production database remotely
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2020-06-11 03:16:13 Re: Potential G2-item cycles under serializable isolation