| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Mingw task for Cirrus CI |
| Date: | 2022-08-04 08:38:34 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGJfYqLEap0a4Ct-LKJFP-jRUT1iOQEDdfPvnTo2wp_jkA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 2:04 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I noticed that this says:
>
> [01:01:45.657] sqlda.pgc: In function 'dump_sqlda':
> [01:01:45.657] sqlda.pgc:45:33: warning: format '%d' expects argument
> of type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'long long int' [-Wformat=]
> [01:01:45.657] 45 | "name sqlda descriptor: '%s' value %I64d\n",
> [01:01:45.657] | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> [01:01:45.657] ......
> [01:01:45.657] 49 | sqlda->sqlvar[i].sqlname.data, *(long long int
> *)sqlda->sqlvar[i].sqldata);
> [01:01:45.657] | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> [01:01:45.657] | |
> [01:01:45.657] | long long int
>
> ... but fairywren doesn't. Why would they disagree on recognising %I64d?
Oops, I was looking in the wrong place. fairywren does also shows the warning:
Something to fix, but not directly relevant to this patch. Sorry for the noise.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marco Slot | 2022-08-04 08:56:45 | Re: How is this possible "publication does not exist" |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-08-04 08:38:00 | Re: Fix obsoleted comments for function prototypes |