| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test |
| Date: | 2020-08-30 02:52:57 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGJTiF8rWv8-fPa4dv7fORd2GhuvHKwUA2i1NoVU9nG+GA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 9:11 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I am convinced by your points. So +1 for your proposed patch. I have
> > already reviewed it yesterday and it appears fine to me.
>
> OK, pushed. Thanks for reviewing!
I made a thing to watch out for low probability BF failures and it
told me that a similar failure in async-notify might have reappeared
on brolga:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=brolga&dt=2020-07-15%2008:30:11
| REL_10_STABLE
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=brolga&dt=2020-05-21%2009:17:13
| REL9_6_STABLE
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=brolga&dt=2020-04-22%2009:13:38
| REL9_6_STABLE
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=brolga&dt=2020-04-05%2009:38:13
| REL9_6_STABLE
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=brolga&dt=2020-04-03%2021:17:39
| REL9_6_STABLE
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2020-08-30 03:21:45 | Re: Windows buildfarm members vs. new async-notify isolation test |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-08-30 00:39:08 | Re: Background writer and checkpointer in crash recovery |