| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: macOS prefetching support |
| Date: | 2024-09-03 01:47:34 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGJLET-1VjKpwEenx1Uycz02+iHVerbirtLg9av56X_g5w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 1:35 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> On 17.08.24 00:01, Thomas Munro wrote:
> > I think that's fine. I don't really like the word "prefetch", could
> > mean many different things. What about "requires OS support for
> > issuing read-ahead advice", which uses a word that appears in both of
> > those interfaces?
>
> I like that term.
A couple of other places still use the old specific terminology. PSA.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Standardize-read-ahead-advice-terminology.patch | text/x-patch | 3.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2024-09-03 01:52:20 | Add callback in pgstats for backend initialization |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-09-03 01:35:15 | Re: Partitioned tables and [un]loggedness |