On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 8:34 AM Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Even if that's just me being delusional, I'd still prefer Alvaro's
> approach to have distinct switches for each collation system.
Hi Julien,
Makes sense. But why use the name "glibc" in the code and user
interface? The name of the collation provider in PostgreSQL is "libc"
(for example in the CREATE COLLATION command), and the problem applies
no matter who makes your libc.
--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com