Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Support for NSS as a libpq TLS backend
Date: 2020-07-15 09:26:27
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJJXLcqbtWv69C0b2x8q_PUC4=axfezay0c-TO3A2FpxA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 5:10 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> -#define LARGE_OFF_T (((off_t) 1 << 62) - 1 + ((off_t) 1 << 62))
> +#define LARGE_OFF_T ((((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31) - 1 + (((off_t) 1 << 31) << 31))
>
> I see the same when I use Debian's autoconf, but not FreeBSD's or
> MacPorts', despite all being version 2.69. That seems to be due to
> non-upstreamed changes added by the Debian maintainers (I see the
> off_t thing mentioned in /usr/share/doc/autoconf/changelog.Debian.gz).

By the way, Dagfinn mentioned that these changes were in fact
upstreamed, and happened to be beta-released today[1], and are due out
in ~3 months as 2.70. That'll be something for us to coordinate a bit
further down the road.

[1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2020-07/msg00006.html

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2020-07-15 10:41:02 Re: Policy on cross-posting to multiple lists
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2020-07-15 09:15:09 gs_group_1 crashing on 13beta2/s390x