Re: A failure in 031_recovery_conflict.pl on Debian/s390x

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: A failure in 031_recovery_conflict.pl on Debian/s390x
Date: 2023-09-06 23:57:51
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJGTXuVe81w2biHVQ+NDtB2e8-dZd2y_8o6a_wgqtguSw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I have now disabled the test in 15 and 16 (like the older branches).
I'll see about getting the fixes into master today, and we can
contemplate back-patching later, after we've collected a convincing
volume of test results from the build farm, CI and hopefully your
s390x master snapshot builds (if that is a thing).

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2023-09-07 00:36:29 Re: Add 'worker_type' to pg_stat_subscription
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-09-06 23:29:08 Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?