Re: Opinion poll: Sending an automated email to a thread when it gets added to the commitfest

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Opinion poll: Sending an automated email to a thread when it gets added to the commitfest
Date: 2024-08-27 01:38:53
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJCeXRfQa9MbteZaVXCSRk8WiW4bQ7O3fN1zStVtGqk2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 9:44 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 17, 2024 at 11:36 AM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I don't really object, but I think a better aim would be to merge
> > CFbot with CF so that we could get to those places from the CF entry.

I've built a system for pushing all the data required to show the
cfbot traffic lights over to the CF app, and shared it with Magnus to
see if he likes it. If so, hopefully some more progress soon...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-08-27 01:40:13 Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables.
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2024-08-27 00:32:21 Re: Significant Execution Time Difference Between PG13.14 and PG16.4 for Query on information_schema Tables.