Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?
Date: 2019-09-10 00:05:20
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJA2Fowbi_S_GAZpjCyfr8b==Ycivp23uUU9YsFHa_oEA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 5:04 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Adding to CF.

Rebased. An OID clashed so re-roll the dice. Also spotted a typo.

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Add-SQL-type-xid8-to-expose-FullTransactionId-to--v2.patch application/octet-stream 13.9 KB
0002-Introduce-xid8-variants-of-the-txid_XXX-fmgr-func-v2.patch application/octet-stream 30.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-09-10 00:13:25 Re: Should we add xid_current() or a int8->xid cast?
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2019-09-09 23:43:09 Re: Consolidate 'unique array values' logic into a reusable function?