From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A failure in 031_recovery_conflict.pl on Debian/s390x |
Date: | 2023-08-08 17:23:57 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKGJ99MKTS3DkX8XO4TNebGXDTXCMk883jy8R=EHj_9pw0w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 2:01 AM Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:
> Putting that patch on top of v8 made it pass 294 times before exiting
> like this:
>
> [08:52:34.134](0.032s) ok 1 - buffer pin conflict: cursor with conflicting pin established
> Waiting for replication conn standby's replay_lsn to pass 0/3430000 on primary
> done
> timed out waiting for match: (?^:User was holding shared buffer pin for too long) at t/031_recovery_conflict.pl line 318.
Can you reproduce that with logging like this added on top?
diff --git a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c
index 5b663a2997..72f5274c95 100644
--- a/src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c
+++ b/src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c
@@ -629,6 +629,7 @@ SetStartupBufferPinWaitBufId(int bufid)
/* use volatile pointer to prevent code rearrangement */
volatile PROC_HDR *procglobal = ProcGlobal;
+ elog(LOG, "XXX SetStartupBufferPinWaitBufId(%d)", bufid);
procglobal->startupBufferPinWaitBufId = bufid;
}
@@ -640,8 +641,11 @@ GetStartupBufferPinWaitBufId(void)
{
/* use volatile pointer to prevent code rearrangement */
volatile PROC_HDR *procglobal = ProcGlobal;
+ int bufid;
- return procglobal->startupBufferPinWaitBufId;
+ bufid = procglobal->startupBufferPinWaitBufId;
+ elog(LOG, "XXX GetStartupBufferPinWaitBufId() -> %d", bufid);
+ return bufid;
}
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2023-08-08 17:41:10 | Re: pgsql: Some refactoring to export json(b) conversion functions |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2023-08-08 16:34:58 | Re: Cirrus-ci is lowering free CI cycles - what to do with cfbot, etc? |