| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Date: | 2025-02-28 23:38:37 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGJ4ciMth5=0sT-+ajiBOqjWJHxfed4MYbs_qatN90652Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 6:37 AM Jacob Champion
<jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Should we maybe consider just doing that across the board, and put up
> with the inefficiency? Admittedly 1ms is a lot more dead time than
> 1ns...
Last time I checked, NetBSD is still using scheduler ticks (100hz
periodic interrupt) for all this kind of stuff so it's even worse than
that :-)
> I prefer your patch, personally.
Cool, I'll commit it shortly unless someone else comes up with a better idea.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2025-03-01 00:05:43 | Add assertion for failed alloc to palloc0() and palloc_extended() |
| Previous Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-02-28 23:18:29 | Re: Should work_mem be stable for a prepared statement? |