From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Direct I/O |
Date: | 2023-04-12 07:37:42 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKGJ407fP_0+aQ_FZQjTMpu=qQ8XyrfBtYzUTMWUMFp7FOA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 5:48 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 3:04 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 2:56 PM Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:
> > > I'm hitting a panic in t_004_io_direct. The build is running on
> > > overlayfs on tmpfs/ext4 (upper/lower) which is probably a weird
> > > combination but has worked well for building everything over the last
> > > decade. On Debian unstable:
After trying a couple of things and doing some googling, it looks like
it's tmpfs that rejects it, not overlayfs, so I'd adjust that commit
message slightly. Of course it's a completely reasonable thing to
expect the tests to pass (or in this case be skipped) in a tmpfs, eg
/tmp on some distributions. (It's a strange to contemplate what
O_DIRECT means for tmpfs, considering that it *is* the page cache,
kinda, and I see people have been arguing about that for a couple of
decades since O_DIRECT was added to Linux; doesn't seem that helpful
to me that it rejects it, but 🤷).
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2023-04-12 07:55:28 | RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |
Previous Message | Daniel Gustafsson | 2023-04-12 07:19:49 | Re: [PATCH] Add `verify-system` sslmode to use system CA pool for server cert |