Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jakub Wartak <Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Date: 2021-04-28 22:46:14
Message-ID: CA+hUKGJ03Q-TmE8-JzAm04_1maYus6_kX7XB--JBh1K63agSbQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 4:45 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> > Tom, any chance you could check if your machine repros the issue before
> > these commits?
>
> Wilco, but it'll likely take a little while to get results ...

FWIW I also chewed through many megawatts trying to reproduce this on
a PowerPC system in 64 bit big endian mode, with an emulator. No
cigar. However, it's so slow that I didn't make it to 10 runs...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-04-28 23:24:53 Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Previous Message Erik Rijkers 2021-04-28 22:07:01 gcc 11.1.0 warnings in llvmjit_expr.c