Re: Syncing pg_multixact directories

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Syncing pg_multixact directories
Date: 2020-09-23 04:11:42
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+yiFn9fH5g+P5kJ8QTa1ScUnC0iRb3eP_W2p3DAdVBOw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:09 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 07:05:36PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2020-09-23 13:45:51 +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> >> I think we should be ensuring that directory entries for newly created
> >> multixact files are durable at checkpoint time. Please see attached.
> >
> > Good catch! Probably that should probably be backpatched...
>
> +1. Passing that down to the SLRU layer is a nice thing to do. Were
> you planning to send a second patch here? The commit log generated
> mentions patch 1/2.

Oh, that's just because I also have another patch, for master only, to
go on top, but that's in another thread about SLRU fsync offloading.
Sorry for the confusion.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2020-09-23 04:23:27 Re: Removing unneeded self joins
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-09-23 04:09:06 Re: Syncing pg_multixact directories