Re: GiST VACUUM

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Костя Кузнецов <chapaev28(at)ya(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: GiST VACUUM
Date: 2019-06-26 03:07:49
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+q8sYnhStNvpwnozTS-BJKj0Ade5wmwJe-wZTqspmmMg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 2:33 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 02:38:43PM +0500, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> > I feel a little uncomfortable with number 0x7fffffff right in code.
>
> PG_INT32_MAX...

MaxTransactionId / 2?

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-06-26 03:33:22 Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests vs existing users in an installation
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2019-06-26 02:33:09 Re: GiST VACUUM