Re: Optimising latch signals

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Optimising latch signals
Date: 2020-11-25 21:54:48
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+eKbn7DvqcY1+mk3OXBHCRgimBXSPwnUaY_CQroOLZQA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:49 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'll add this to the next commitfest.

Let's see if this version fixes the Windows compile error and warning
reported by cfbot.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Optimize-latches-to-send-fewer-signals.patch text/x-patch 2.7 KB
v4-0002-Use-SIGURG-rather-than-SIGUSR1-for-latches.patch text/x-patch 7.7 KB
v4-0003-Use-signalfd-for-epoll-latches.patch text/x-patch 12.2 KB
v4-0004-Use-EVFILT_SIGNAL-for-kqueue-latches.patch text/x-patch 5.8 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-11-25 23:35:19 Re: pg_dump, ATTACH, and independently restorable child partitions
Previous Message Victor Yegorov 2020-11-25 21:20:44 Re: Deleting older versions in unique indexes to avoid page splits