Re: Tid scan improvements

From: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Edmund Horner <ejrh00(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Tid scan improvements
Date: 2019-08-01 05:56:47
Message-ID: CA+hUKG+KrKRugW-KhPiczgCX05zW22u+T4padMbWdebKLHiPjA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 5:51 PM Edmund Horner <ejrh00(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 at 17:47, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 5:34 PM Edmund Horner <ejrh00(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > Should we move to CF? We have been in the CF cycle for almost a year now...
> >
> > Hi Edmund,
> >
> > No worries, that's how it goes sometimes. Please move it to the next
> > CF if you think you'll find some time before September. Don't worry
> > if it might have to be moved again. We want the feature, and good
> > things take time!
>
> Ok thanks.
>
> I tried moving it to the new commitfest, but it seems I cannot from
> its current state.

Done. You have to move it to "Needs review" first, and then move to
next. (Perhaps we should change that... I don't think that obstacle
achieves anything?)

--
Thomas Munro
https://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeevan Ladhe 2019-08-01 05:59:54 Re: concerns around pg_lsn
Previous Message Edmund Horner 2019-08-01 05:50:54 Re: Tid scan improvements